Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGoerres, Achim
dc.contributor.authorKumlin, Staffan
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Rune
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-24T12:15:56Z
dc.date.available2020-01-24T12:15:56Z
dc.date.created2019-04-10T15:31:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Social Policy. 2019, 48 (4), 861-884.
dc.identifier.issn0047-2794
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2637834
dc.description.abstractHow do political leaders politicise welfare state “reform pressures”, e.g. unemployment, ageing or globalisation, in election campaigns? Competing expectations range from no politicization at all to a clear and unbiased coupling between pressures and intended policy responses. Eighteen speeches held by prime ministerial candidates at election-year party congresses in Germany, Norway and Sweden (2000–2010) reveal an unfinished and biased problem-solution coupling. On the one hand, even in these affluent countries pressures are frequently politicised. On the other hand, leaders either cherry-pick less painful policy solutions, or refrain altogether from debating them. So, while citizens learn that the welfare state is pressured, they are not exposed to the full range of policies they increasingly have reason to expect after elections.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titlePressure without Pain: What Politicians (Don’t) Tell You about Welfare State Change
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.source.pagenumber861-884
dc.source.volume48
dc.source.journalJournal of Social Policy
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0047279419000138
dc.identifier.cristin1691422
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 217122
cristin.unitcode7437,0,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for samfunnsforskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel