Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrætteberg, Håkon Solbu
dc.contributor.authorGrødem, Anne Skevik
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T10:52:06Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T10:52:06Z
dc.date.created2021-09-15T10:30:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1369-6866
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2781377
dc.description.abstractSocial policies are legislated nationally and implemented locally, and despite national attempts at vertical policy coordination, implementation varies. The aim of this article is to better understand variations in local implementation of national policies, emphasising, in particular, structural conditions. Our case is a legislative change in Norway that obliged municipalities to implement compulsory participation and conditionality for young recipients of social assistance. We conducted a comparative case study analysis in which, through 28 qualitative interviews, we compared six municipalities. We found that municipalities that have conceptualised compulsory participation as physical work and long hours in catch-all programmes are also the municipalities that sanction through benefit cuts. The municipalities that were more reluctant to cut benefits were those with the least straining requirements in terms of content and scope. We discuss local variation in terms of local-level path dependence, the size of the municipality and state supervision of municipalities.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleFrom national activation legislation to local practices in Norway—Why the same law gives diverse practices
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Social Welfare
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijsw.12513
dc.identifier.cristin1934438
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257603
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record