Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGrødem, Anne Skevik
dc.contributor.authorKitterød, Hege
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T08:18:36Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T08:18:36Z
dc.date.created2023-06-27T13:09:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0895-9420
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3084964
dc.description.abstractA number of studies have identified a gender gap in social attitudes, but few have studied the phenomenon in the context of old age pension schemes. Using data from a 2019 Norwegian survey, we examined patterns of support for three distribution principles in pensions (anti-poverty, merit, and equality). Compared to men, women are more supportive of the anti-poverty and equality principles, and less supportive of the merit principle. The gender difference for the anti-poverty principle persists in multivariate analyses, but disappears for the merit and equality principles when we control for socioeconomic factors, particularly income. Analyzing men and women separately revealed that partnership status and health interact with gender. Income however appears to affect men and women equally; high-income women are as likely as high-income men to support the principle of merit and reject the principle of equality.
dc.description.abstractIs There a Gender Gap in Support for Distributive Principles in Old Age Pension Schemes?
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleIs There a Gender Gap in Support for Distributive Principles in Old Age Pension Schemes?
dc.title.alternativeIs There a Gender Gap in Support for Distributive Principles in Old Age Pension Schemes?
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalJournal of Aging & Social Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08959420.2023.2225374
dc.identifier.cristin2158623
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel